
Rare, excellent DVD rendition (Technical Information) - While I think this is an awesome film (and think the original is quite a landmark as well), this review is intended to supply additional information from the packaging not provided by Amazon. Catalog/Categorization: Catalog #: CPMD2302Stereo. 107 minutes. Not Rated. Suitable for most audiences. Parental discretion advised. Distributed by Central Park Media, produced by Bar Belle Productions, 1985. Language: English Audio Format: Dolby Digital StereoAudio Notes: Dolby Digital soundtracks contain up to 5.1 channels of discrete audio. Playback from 2-channel DVD player outputs is compatible with stereo and Dolby Pro Logic reproduction.Dual Layer Format: Layer transition may trigger a slight pause. DVD Features: Bodybuilder Profiles, Director Profile, Production Notes, Director Interview, Photo Gallery, Previews and moreDVD-ROM Features: Interview with George Butler, Full Song Listing, Photo Gallery, Production Credits and moreNote: Reverse side of the case s back panel (visible through inside of case) contains information on cast and chapter stops, however, my copy of this video is still factory-sealed so I am unable to provide this information. I hope this is still helpful to those considering this rare film!
please produce more DVD s of this movie - Hi, I love this movie---please re-issue it on DVD again....and do a good transfer...thanks, p
This is better than Pumping Iron! - When you watch this film you wonder what happened to the Ms. Olympia contest where women look like healthy athletes (Carla Dunlop, Rachel McLish) to the vein-popping, manly-looking contestants of today? The movie hints the answer with the introduction of Bev Francis. Though she does not win the contest, you can sense that her type is the wave of the future.I liked this movie far better to Arnold s version, though Arnold was able to launch a mega-career from his movie where Rachel McLish only had a brief and unmemorable movie career.The competition between McLish and Dunlop is fierce and more intriguing than the Arnold/Ferrigno competition of the men s version. Just watching these two goddesses compete is worth the price of the disk!
Best female bodybuilding movie. - Better script than the first one and would have been better if it followed the Ms. olympia contest intead.
Historic documentary for women s body building enthusiasts - In any athletic field, the most watched female athletes are those who have a distinct physical presence. Just being good at your sport may allow you to win medals but you won t get much popular or media attention. This historic documentary highlights why this became a huge issue back in the 1980s when women s bodybuilding just started to take off. Rachel McLish was considered the favourite for the Caesars Palace World Cup Championship. She was very toned, lightly muscled and considered very attractive by most people. Bev Francis was an Australian powerlifting champion who shocked people wherever she went because she was so muscular. Everybody agreed that she had bigger muscles than anybody else but where there was disagreement was whether it was aesthetic for a women to be that heavily muscled. Bev comes across as very honest, dedicated, outspoken and caring, something you would expect when you see her. Lori Bowen was a Rachel McLish fan, so much so that she actually looked a lot like her. She and her boyfriend (who is a go-go dancer) dream that she will win big. She is from an economically depressed background and you get the feeling she has struggled for whatevr she got. Carla Dunlap is very well muscled, although not as big as Bev. She comes across as a very intelligent, outspoken woman, the type you would see in a unversity classroom arguing with her professor about an issue in metaphysics. I won t tell you who wins because that would spoil the movie but let me tell you why I gave it 3 stars. It explores the issue of sexualizing women in the sport of bodybuilding and at the same time tries to educate the viewer about the sport. Although it does fairly well at both tasks, the two different lens that are applied tend to make the final product less effective. Is it about women and their objectification in bodybuilding - something that continues today ? Or is it just a story of the competitors ? Or does it try to educate viewers about bodybuilding as a sport for women. In the end although you would have learned a little about each part, you are not quite sure.